Address Family Indicator (AFI) and Subsequent Address Family Indicator (SAFI) are fields within Multi-Protocol BGP (MP-BGP) extensions. The information in these fields is sent as part of the neighbor capability exchange during the process of becoming BGP peers. The information in these fields is used to tell the remote peer what address family (IPv4, IPv6, VPNv4, VPNv6 etc.) and what specific sub-address family (multicast or unicast) the local BGP router will be transporting routes for.
With eBGP peerings, is the âPrefer the oldest route/Route that was learned earlierâ considered the final one? Since this seems like the final tiebreaker that will always pick one path over another without moving to the rest (lowest RID/neighbor iP).
So does this mean that the lowest RID/neighbor IP tiebreakers are limited to iBGP peerings only?
The âOldest Pathâ attribute written out in full is the one that says: âWhen both paths are external, prefer the path that was received first (the oldest one).â
So this attribute is only valid for routes external to the local AS. Now your question comes down to this: Is it possible for this to be a tie? Well, this attribute is designed in such a way that itâs extremely unlikely to result in a tie. This is because it is based on the timing of when the route was received.
In a real-world scenario, itâs practically impossible for a router to receive two routes from two different peers at the exact same microsecond. Thus, this tiebreaker will almost always be able to determine a preference between routes, unless perhaps in the highly unlikely event of some form of synchronization or a bug.
So to answer your question, it is not impossible, but it is extremely unlikely that this tie breaker will be unable to resolve the issue. So in virtually all cases, for external paths, this will be the last attribute to be checked.
Well, the attributes are used to choose the best âpathâ not the best âpeeringâ. So it doesnât really matter what peerings the particular router has, but what is taken into account is if the path is external to the local AS. An iBGP router that has no eBGP peerings can still receive two paths to a particular external prefix, so the attribute is still examined. Does that make sense?
So does this mean that the lowest RID/neighbor IP tiebreakers are limited to iBGP peerings only?
If the received route contains an external prefix but was advetised to us by an iBGP neighbor, doesnât that automatically make it an iBGP route? So the âPrefer oldest path for eBGPâ tiebreaker cannot be used there.
By the way, an excellent explanation about everything Iâve asked for, thank you
An eBGP route is defined as a route received directly from an eBGP neighbor (a neighbor in a different AS). When the route is first received via eBGP, itâs marked as an external route.
If that route is then propagated within the same AS using iBGP (from one router in the AS to another), it retains its characteristics as an eBGP-learned route, including its original AS Path and other attributes. However, the mechanism of its propagation within the AS is through iBGP. In other words, the âsourceâ or âoriginâ of the route in terms of AS traversal is still eBGP because it is external, but the immediate source of propagation within the AS is an iBGP peer.
What does that mean for our attribute? When we refer to the âoldest path for eBGP routesâ in the BGP decision-making process, weâre talking about routes that originated from an eBGP neighbor, regardless of whether they were subsequently propagated within the AS using iBGP.
So if a BGP router learns about a route to a network external to its local AS, regardless of whether it learns about that route via iBGP or eBGP, the particular attribute applies, simply because the path is to an external network.
Note that the text of the attribute is âwhen both paths are externalâ. It doesnât stipulate how you learned those paths (iBGP or eBGP), but simply that the paths are external.
No, but it does mean that the lowest RID/neighbor IP tiebreakers are limited to multiple routes to internal paths.
Hello everyone,
Iâm getting confused over path selection, say my router gets 3 routes for identical destinations : ospf with default parameters; ebgp with default parameters; ibgp with local preference set to 200. How is the decision made and which route will be selected?
This is an excellent question, and its answer will help to clarify the process by which routes are installed in the routing table.
When a router learns about paths to particular destinations from multiple sources (OSPF, BGP, static routes etc), before the actual BGP path selection process is even considered, the first thing that happens is it chooses which source of the routing information to use. This is determined using the Administrative Distance (AD).
