Hello Laz.
Thanks, that makes sense!
I have a question regarding WLAN design.
Where is a WLC generally placed? I understand that this differs if you have a centralized or a distributed architecture but I just need a basic idea.
I often see it placed at the core layer which I suppose makes sense if you have several distribution layers connected to it. That way, each distribution switch is somewhat equally far away from it.
I guess it also makes sense if your user traffic is mostly from down to up, to a data center or to the internet since the core layer would be the closest to those resources. The configuration here is pretty simple and you can even configure a HA pair with another WLC.
But then again, if you have several remote sites and branches, having everything sent to your core layer, maybe even over a WAN link might not always be the most efficient method, so thatâs where you could use a distributed architecture and have each site or a distribution layer have its own WLC. Another reason that I can think of here to use the distributed architecture is if you have way too many APs to the point where one or two WLCs donât support them.
It seems like a lot to consider, to be honest. If your remote site has, say 2 APs, you donât even need to add a WLC to it, you could just configure those two APs to run in FlexConnect instead.
Thank you!
David