# DMVPN Phase 2 RIP Routing

**URL:** https://forum.networklessons.com/t/dmvpn-phase-2-rip-routing/1307
**Category:** Lessons Discussion
**Created:** [December 29, 2016, 8:24pm UTC](https://forum.networklessons.com/t/dmvpn-phase-2-rip-routing/1307 "2016-12-29T20:24:42Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jose.gro1992](https://cdn-forum.networklessons.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/j/a5b964/32.png) [@jose.gro1992](https://forum.networklessons.com/u/jose.gro1992)
#### Post date: [October 20, 2019, 4:06pm UTC](https://forum.networklessons.com/t/dmvpn-phase-2-rip-routing/1307/6 "2019-10-20T16:06:06Z")

</div>

Hi Rene,  
There is something I did not understand, general speaking, when we use RIP, do not the interfaces sending the routes to another device, announce themself are the next hop? (same way as with EIGRP) .  
For DMVPN Phase 2 output

```
Spoke2#show ip route rip 

      1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R 1.1.1.1 [120/1] via 172.16.123.1, 00:00:01, Tunnel0
      2.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R 2.2.2.2 [120/2] via 172.16.123.2, 00:00:01, Tunnel0

```

Is showing 172.16.123.2 as the next hop indeed for 2.2.2.2 but metric is still 2, so does not that mean the traffic is still going through the hub??

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.networklessons.com/t/dmvpn-phase-2-rip-routing/1307)._