# Two (2) switches with VLANs and Cisco ASA firewalls configuration

**URL:** <https://forum.networklessons.com/t/two-2-switches-with-vlans-and-cisco-asa-firewalls-configuration/14717>\
**Category:** ASA\
**Created:** [June 22, 2021, 11:13am UTC](https://forum.networklessons.com/t/two-2-switches-with-vlans-and-cisco-asa-firewalls-configuration/14717 "2021-06-22T11:13:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lagapidis](https://cdn-forum.networklessons.com/user_avatar/forum.networklessons.com/lagapidis/32/4949_2.png) [@lagapidis](https://forum.networklessons.com/u/lagapidis)\
**Post date:** [January 7, 2022, 7:49am UTC](https://forum.networklessons.com/t/two-2-switches-with-vlans-and-cisco-asa-firewalls-configuration/14717/6 "2022-01-07T07:49:18Z")

</div>

Hello Neil

I believe most of your question has been answered in this post:

> [@ASA to Layer3 switch](https://forum.networklessons.com/t/asa-to-layer3-switch/16091/2):
>
> Hello Niel Concerning your update, yes, you’ve corrected the next-hop IP address for the routing in the ASA, and that has resolved the routing problem, so that’s great. Concerning a high availability configuration, there are various options to use. You can use an Active/Standby configuration with two ASAs as seen in the [ASA Active/Standby lesson](https://networklessons.com/cisco/asa-firewall/cisco-asa-firewall-active-standby-failover), or an Active/Active failover scenario as shown in the following Cisco documentation: [https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa84/confi…](https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/ha_active_active.html)

However, can you clarify what you mean when you say that:

> [@neil](#):
>
> with ASA 9.17.1 interface Redundant1 doesn’t work

Let us know so we can respond appropriately.

Thanks!

Laz

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.networklessons.com/t/two-2-switches-with-vlans-and-cisco-asa-firewalls-configuration/14717)._