So. is this because my permit_L0 ACL does not have permit statement that matches?
But, i have noticed even if i add a permit statement in my ACL with a match, it still checks the next route-map statement.
I have two routers R1 and R2, R1 is advertising everything via EIGRP
and on R2 using distribute list in to filter routes.
R2#show ip access-lists Standard IP access list permit_L0 10 permit 192.168.0.0, wildcard bits 0.0.0.255 (1 match) Standard IP access list permit_L1 10 permit 192.168.1.0, wildcard bits 0.0.0.255 (2 matches) R2#show route-map route-map permit_L0_L1, permit, sequence 10 Match clauses: ip address (access-lists): permit_L0 Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes route-map permit_L0_L1, permit, sequence 20 Match clauses: ip address (access-lists): permit_L1 Set clauses: Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes R1#show ip int brief | i up Ethernet0/0 192.168.12.1 YES NVRAM up up Loopback0 192.168.0.1 YES NVRAM up up Loopback1 192.168.1.1 YES NVRAM up up Loopback2 192.168.2.1 YES NVRAM up up Loopback3 192.168.3.1 YES NVRAM up up R1#show runn | sec eigrp router eigrp 10 network 0.0.0.0
Permitting 2 subnets: 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 and 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255